kintaris80,508 (63,465)

i think the issue sony has without being a 100% sure is that a game showing nudity for the sake of nudity geta censored. games that display violence/nudity in context to

its narrative is allowed if that makes sense.

my analogy probably sucks or is completely wrong, but take a porn movie, thats nudity for the sake of nudity. take a proper movie with a narrative with nudity

which is completely different

i think its why they censored the naked ass flare in dmc5. it was just there for the sake of being there. it had nothing to dobwith anything

thats not to say sonys censorship isnt stupid. it is. its a grey area of what is allowed and what isnt. developers should allow to display their games how they want

within reasons obviously.

How they gonna do porn without taking their clothes off? :P

At the end of the day, Sony can censor whatever they like, but I prefer to play games as the developer intended, which means I am likely to buy affected games on PC to

get that experience. As it stands, I am waiting to see what features the PS5 has to decide whether I am going Sony next gen. Features are what is important to me on a

console. I don't care much for exclusives generally and censorship is an annoyance but I have a gaming PC as an alternative . Let's see if Sony can offer enough

in the feature department to keep me on PS next gen

BTW, I am perfectly for a company deciding to carry out QA or censor whatever they wish. There are benefits to multiple approaches

The way I see it it doesn’t affect the game this censored stuff and it’s very little that’s even changed

If it affected the gameplay I’d have a problem

Also I kinda see their point with underage Jon stuff that’s not really underage but looks it when it has so much flesh showing. None of that should be acceptable imo.

But that also doesn’t really explain why they’d censor trish but again it’s hardly something one would notice unless they even read about it on the internet.

Underage japan stuff not Jon stuff I meant lol

Im still confused why you can have sex at 16 but cant watch it till your 18. Regarding Sony, I think they are being oversensitive.

Kids nowerdays see far worse than a bare bum in a video game just by going on their mobile phones which they seem to have from about the age of 5.

A LOT of companies are currently bowing to pressure to make their platforms more family friendly to avoid turning away advertisers.

This is the reason Tumblr gave for their porn ban, and Reddit just announced it will ban all ads for "adult oriented" products.

I'm more worried about more than just butt-flare in DMC5 or not being able to look at kids pants in a Japanese game, but I believe its all coming from the same place.

It will be interesting to see what new platforms, products, services and payment methods we see over the next 5-20 years

I just think it's sad that this is the world we live in now. The vocal minority seem to be dictating what we can and can't do now and it doesn't even make any sense.

And the worst part is...it's not even CONSISTENT and that's the part that gets on my nerves more than anything. And yeah Liquid, our laws are stupid.

You can't drink, smoke or even drive until after you can have sex, so it's like, you're considered responsible enough to look after a kid at 16 but can't do those before,

like WTF? Also, you can play the lottery at 16 but gambling in general (aside from penny machines or w/e) you have to wait until 18. SMH

For something like Senran, it's the main draw of the game (the lewdness) so censoring that too much is a problem to me. But really, they're cartoons anyway, so why would

that automatically translate to "I'd go out and molest a child?" People of that mindset don't need any encouragement imo. Now, if they're outright ADVOCATING it, that's

different and I agree with stopping it but to assume that it'll cause someone to go and do something stupid is just penalising the decent majority for the sake of the few

who have mental issues. But once again, the inconsistency gets me most and GTA still is allowed, yet anything remotely sexual isn't? FML

I still don't get why Super Seducer was banned, that actually was supposed to teach you how *not* to treat women, yet they thought it was offensive?

Just because those hypothetical scenarios where you mistreated them were in the game?

It's a slippery slope and before long, it wouldn't surprise me if everything we were allowed to play was PG-13 the rate it's going.

And yeah, I think it's all about money, like Reevys said, like EVERYTHING is now.

im still proud of you for trying sweetheart

thanks daddy, i'll aim for more completions after playing through the next 5 kingdom hearts, because screw trying to plat KH's.

I agree, it's a pretty fun game to beat but not that fun to complete. I don't know why I pushed myself to do it, but it is my highest ratio platinum so there's that.

I really enjoyed the game and dont mind a little bit of a grind if its a fun game to play. I normally give up though if a new game comes out i want to play.

I do admit the grind seems less of a grind if your playing with friends though.

Very nice!

Congrats! but This became plat #398. Two more to the next biggie!

Super meat boy

Cheers all! Badly: might be #500, unless the sequel is harder.

Ooh first, congrats