Pipsqweek302,872 (250,965)

Nice completion :)

Congrats

Cheers all! This is gonna be the hardest game I've had to rate since Blackwood Crossing as I honestly found most of it pretty frustrating.

I mean, it's clear the devs put a lot of love into this game, the music is great, esp. the main theme, which is now one of my favourites ever...but it's USP is also...

its main weakness (to me). I think it's just one of those instances where it just didn't quite click with me personally, though there are definite design flaws with it.

The fact that on TA, this has a 4.5 average rating with a decent number of votes (where usually, games like this would be lucky to get 3) means that it probably is...

another TLoU type affair, where I don't dig it as much as the "masses", albeit on a much smaller scale

Nice Congrats

Nice going with this game! How difficult are the DLCs compared to the base game? As in, I struggled my way to the end of the base game but no way in hell I can do the

extreme tracks...how would one fair with the DLC tracks being that they found just the HARD tracks insanely stupid? Lol.

how hard was it?

Cheers all! ATG and Ulven: pretty comparable to the main game, really. Though trophy-wise, most DLC ones aren't *too* bad.

The Extreme tracks really are a lot of trial and error and watching replays/YouTube videos to help you get the techniques down. :P

TBF, the challenges/squirrels are the same as well. I really doubt there's anyone who could've figured out *all* of them on their own.

Eh, I might get the season pass one day if it's ever really, really cheap then...

Well, that was an unexpected comment, I gotta say. :P I just checked my ratings and it's at 25th/76, so still easily top half.

Also, bear in mind some games have gotta be re-rated with my new system (Adam's Venture being the biggie that I saw...) and also bear in mind the *reason* I dock points..

sometimes (which granted, I didn't say why here), literally, the only reason is the length of the game, it's too short. Maybe some minor UI issues as well.

It's the most unique concept I've seen in a puzzle game for an awful long time and that alone makes it worth checking out imo.

And anything 3.5 or above is definitely worth checking out anyway.

Apologies good sir. Think I was just looking at top 50 and it was just under the half way mark. Also forgot your old rating system overweight Ed certain games (I think

The way you rate games now is really good) as you say, 3.5 is definitely worth checking out as only good games get 3 or above! Also, I like unique ideas and if

Anything short length appeals to me and would likely bump a game half a star up

I rarely play Puzzle games but know you do so was curious how it sat but was too hasty with my comment

It's fine. Yeah, it took a while to refine my current system (and there'll likely still be the odd one I look at later and think WTF? lol) but overall, I think...

I'm quite fair with the scores I give. I guess the only thing would be POP ratings, you might take with more of a pinch of salt and the odd game, I'm probably biased. :P

Short can be good for sure as if a game is too long, it can outstay its welcome but when you play a cool one and it's over quickly, it's just as bad imo.

Yup good fun And congrats on your legit win... funny how you only suggested best of 3 AFTER the 1st round J/k., big grind to enjoy now

I saw that you were playing Slayer

Is this one any good? I think it's the same decs as Pure Hold'em which is a very average poker game IMO. Do you know how Pure Pool compares to Hustle Kings?

Slayer: you coulda offered me a best of 5 and I'd have taken it. The first game was the best one, though, even though I lost, close!

ATG: yeah, it's pretty decent overall, though I may be docking one or 2 points from my current 4/5 as the online was awful, dropped out a fair few times and laggy AF.

Also the unstackable accolades are annoying!

Dunno how it compares to Hustle Kings as I haven't played it, the same people made that too, though.