MitchCRafT_nM3 said:...I mean i am all for supporting the VITA but i am not all for being taken for a shmuck and with the prices SONY charge ... i am looking on line just at these kind of prices....
32gig £55 , are they having a fecking laugh!?
...
I could buy a god damn terabyte for £50 for my PS4 and they want me to pay that for a miserable 32 fecking GB for something that has been out for years with barely any games coming out.Friend, if you are seeing a 32GB for £55, you are shopping in entirely the wrong place. In fact that price is so bad I would suggest you never go back to that site ever again, as they are clearly trying to rip you off for every penny.
Now, right now it seems 32GBs are a bit rare, but there are an abundance of smaller memory cards, and with 16GBs at £25 at Argos (not an impressive price) I would not pay more than £45 for a 32GB. I remember when you could consistently find them for £40, or £35 on a good day.
But you can get a 64GB for around £55, increasingly cheaply, so why on earth would you pay over the odds for a 32GB?
The 64GBs are all around better for the convenience of not having to swap, and the space savings of not having to have duplicate data on each card.
In my experience a 64GB on vita is basically like a Terabyte on console, it's practically bottomless as you can have dozens of games you don't even play on it, so it's not really comparing like for like if you compare the sizes as if they were used in the same way. PS4 games are what, 20-50GB each, vita games are a few hundred MB to a few GB for larger ones, and some of the smallest stuff is even tens of MB so you could fit hundreds or thousands (more than you could buy of those then). FFV and FFVI are each 134MB apparently, and you know how much gaming is in those little packets. At least half an hour per MB lol.